|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 65-69
Assessment of apolipoproteinsA1, E, and Insulin Resistance in Iraqi male patients with acute myocardial infarction
Hind Sh Ahmed
Al-Mustansiriyah Diabetic Centre, Baghdad, Iraq
|Date of Submission||01-Oct-2020|
|Date of Decision||30-Oct-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||20-Nov-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||6-Jul-2023|
Dr. Hind Sh Ahmed
Al-mustansiriyah Diabetic Centre, Baghdad
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a risk factor for ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction. It often manifests in myocardial infarction and is regarded as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, which can provide early risk stratification for recurrent acute coronary events. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the levels of apolipoproteinsA1, E with IR in Iraqi male patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients and Methods: Forty-five male patients with AMI were enrolled in this study. Their age range was 40–55 years and they are compared with 45 healthy male as a control group. All patients with AMI were checked up by a cardiologist in Iraqi Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases/Al-Hariry Hospital/Baghdad. Fasting venous blood samples were collected from all the subjects. Laboratory evaluations consisted of fasting serum glucose (FSG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum insulin, and lipid profile. Furthermore, apolipoproteinsA1 and E levels were determined in this study. Results: There was a significant increase in FSG and insulin levels in patients group as compared to the controls. In addition, there was an elevation in HbA1c and homeostasis model assessment for IR in those patients, but they were not significant. There was a significant increase (P = 0.001) in serum total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, while there was a significant decrease in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients group as compared to the controls. Moreover, there was a significant increase (P = 0.001) in apolipoprotein E, while a significant decrease (P = 0.001) in apolipoproteinsA1in patients group as compared to the controls. Conclusions: Dyslipidemia, along with insulinemia and glycemia, is one of the most significant IR risk factors in the acute and early recovery phases of myocardial infarction.
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction, apolipoproteins, insulin resistance
|How to cite this article:|
Ahmed HS. Assessment of apolipoproteinsA1, E, and Insulin Resistance in Iraqi male patients with acute myocardial infarction. IRAQI J COMMUNITY MED 2020;33:65-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Ahmed HS. Assessment of apolipoproteinsA1, E, and Insulin Resistance in Iraqi male patients with acute myocardial infarction. IRAQI J COMMUNITY MED [serial online] 2020 [cited 2023 Dec 4];33:65-9. Available from: http://www.journalijcm.org/text.asp?2020/33/2/65/380713
| Introduction|| |
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is well-known pathologically as myocardial cell death due to prolonged ischemia. Lessened cellular glycogen, undisturbed myofibrils, and sarcolemmal disruption, are the chief ultra-structural fluctuations and are seen as initial as 10–15 min after the onset of ischemia.
Insulin resistance (IR) is a risk feature for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The IR frequently exhibits in AMI and is considered a liberated predictor of mortality, which may deliver initial risk stratification for frequent acute coronary proceedings.
IR is defined as decreased sensitivity or responsiveness to the metabolic actions of insulin; consequently, a variety of restrictions, comprising traditional hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia, are deliberated to be IR markers. Nevertheless, some lipid metabolism factors are also supposed to be capable IR markers, with their effect on CVD being well-known. It is identified that free fatty acids block glucose carrying by preventing insulin's cooperation with hepatocytes and monocytes, foremost to hyperglycemia and IR progress.
There is robust evidence that lipid abnormalities such as high plasma triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are associated with increased stroke risk.
Cholesterol can be complexed with apolipoproteins (apos). Besides its beneficial aspects in human physiology, an excess of cholesterol can also be harmful. Several observational studies consistently show an association between elevated LDL-C and high prevalence of CVD in adults, and, on the other hand, between high HDL-C and reduced prevalence of these diseases. Although this concept has been recently debated.,
ApoA1 is a major apo of HDL-C and is involved in the regulation of reverse cholesterol transport and the metabolism of HDL particles. This transport process is regulated by a physical interaction of apoA1 with its molecular partner, the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1, located in the plasma membrane.
Apolipoproteins E (ApoE), a major constituent of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), has been shown to be an essential ligand for the uptake and clearance of atherogenic lipoproteins. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that apoE plays an important role in atherosclerosis by modifying inflammatory responses and facilitating cholesterol efflux from cells. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the levels of apoA1, E with IR in Iraqi male patients with AMI.
| Patients and Methods|| |
Forty-five male patients with AMI were enrolled in this study. Their age range was (40–55) years and they are compared with 45 healthy male as the control group. Privacy and confidentiality were considered after verbal consent. Patients were given the right to withdraw from the study at any time. The questionnaire included duration of AMI, family history, height, weight, heart disease, and hypertension for patients and control groups. All patients with AMI were checked up by a cardiologist in Iraqi Centre for CVDs/Al-Hariry Hospital/Baghdad. The diagnosis of AMI was dependent on the following criteria: (1) typical history of acute chest pain and (2) unequivocal changes of MI in the electrocardiogram to confirm the diagnosis.
Patients with liver, renal, thyroid function disease, and hormonal abnormalities were excluded from this study.
Anthropometric parameters involved body mass index (BMI), systolic- and diastolic-blood pressure (SBP, DBP) are estimated. BMI is calculated according to the following equation:
Laboratory evaluations consisted of fasting serum glucose (FSG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum lipid profile including: (Serum total cholesterol [TC], TG, HDL-C, VLDL, LDL-C), and serum insulin. IR was estimated using the homeostasis model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR) index according to the following equation:
HOMA-IR = G0 × I0/405
Furthermore, serum apoA1 and E levels were determined by (Cusabio, China) kit.
Statistical package of social science (SPSS) version 17.0 international software for statistical analysis, USA was used for the analysis of data. Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation Student's t-test was used to compare between the groups. The P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of patients and control are shown in [Table 1]. There was a significant increase (P ≤ 0.05) in BMI, SBP, and DBP in AMI patients as compared to the controls. There was no significant difference in age between the two groups.
|Table 1: Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of patients and control|
Click here to view
There was a significant increase (P = 0.01) in FSG and insulin levels in AMI patients as compared to the controls [Table 2]. In addition, there was an elevation in HbA1c and HOMA-IR in AMI patients, but they were not significant.
Lipid profile parameters are presented in [Table 3]. There was a significant increase (P = 0.001) in serum TC, TG, LDL-C, and VLDL in AMI group as compared to the controls. Furthermore, there was an elevation in lipid ratios, but they were not significant. A significant increase in apoE, while a significant decrease (P = 0.001) in apoA1was found in AMI patients as compared to the controls [Table 4].
There was a significant negative correlation between apoA1and BMI, FSG, serum insulin, TC, TG, LDL-C, and apoE in AMI patients. While, there was a significant positive correlation between apoA1 and serum HDL-C in AMI patients as compared to the controls [Table 5].
|Table 5: The correlation coefficient of apolipoproteins A-1 with other parameters in acute myocardial infarction patients|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In this study, it has been shown that an association existed between increased lipid-testing intervals of and elevated risk of AMI among Iraqi male patients, which is in agreement with the study of Jellinger et al., in 2017.
There was a significant increase in BMI between the patients and the controls. Furthermore, there was an increase in FSG, HbA1c, insulin, and HOMA-IR in AMI patients. Thus, any method to predict insulin sensitivity in normoglycemic individuals should first be compared with fasting insulin.
Mahato et al., in 2011 reported that estimated risk of CVD has shown to be increased by 18% for each 1% increase in absolute HbA1c value. A positive relationship between HbA1c and CVD has been demonstrated in nondiabetic cases even within normal range of HbA1c. It has been estimated that reducing the HbA1c level by 0.2% could lower the mortality by 10% according to that study.
In addition, it has been reported that a number of clinical and metabolic abnormalities have been associated with IR. The metabolic disorders classified included hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. However, they did confirm that the best method was dependent on glucose status.
Levels of fasting insulin in AMI patients were above 25 μIU/ml, which is the upper limit of the normal insulin reference range. Thus, all patients in this study were hyperinsulinemic.
This study reveals increased levels of TC, TG, LDL-C, and decreased levels of HDL-C. The main disorders of lipid metabolism in this study are hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. This finding is in concord with a previous study on hypertriglyceridemia.
Dyslipidemia characterized by elevated TC, LDL-C, and lowered HDL-C, is a conventional risk factor observed in AMI patients, and is the major cause of atherosclerosis are suggested to act synergistically with non-lipid risk factors to increase atherogenesis. On the other hand, a characteristic dyslipidemia is also associated with IR. Insulin affects the liver apos production. It regulates the enzymatic activity of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and cholesterol ester transport protein. All these factors are likely cause of dyslipidemia in CVD. Moreover, insulin deficiency reduces the activity of hepatic lipase, and several steps in the production of biologically active LPL may be altered in AMI.
Kimm et al., in 2010, demonstrated that the lipid ratios of TC/HDL-C, TG/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C as well as TG and HDL-C, were each consistently associated with the number of metabolic syndrome components, IR based on homeostatic model assessment. The lipids ratios that include information on at least two measures might have a more integrated explanation than single lipid measures such as TG or LDL-C with HDL-C. They were useful makers for both men and women, especially TG/HDL-C ratio in men. Based on the present results, this ratio considers as a simple means to estimate atherogenic dyslipidemia.
Serum HDL-C has been used to predict a person's risk of developing atherosclerosis. Like high LDL-C and low HDL-C <40 mg/dl are associated with a higher risk of developing CVD. Increased TG and decreased HDL-C are considered to be a major risk factor for the development of IR and MS. The TG/HDL-C ratio is also widely used to assess the lipid atherogenesis.
Abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism are important in atherogenesis, obesity, IR, and diabetes; all being major areas of concern for public health, individual wellbeing, and research.
Holmes et al., in 2018, recently confirmed these results in a nested case–control study showing that apoA1 was strongly associated with the risk of MI. Serum apoA1 of, 120 mg/dl for men and, 140 mg/dl for women approximately correspond to what is considered as low for HDL-C, which is in agreement with the present data.
Total number of apoE is increased in metabolic abnormalities are better reflected by TG/HDL-C ratio than LDL-C alone. Once these lipid complexes begin to circulate through the blood, LPL bound to the capillary endothelium of muscles and adipose tissue converts their TG to FA and glycerol. These molecules are then used for energy by most cells or reassembled into TG for storage in adipose tissue.
In general, patients in this study had low levels of HDL-C and apoA1 while high levels of LDL-C, apoE, and TG levels, which typically coexist in people with IR.
Low HDL-C concentrations among people with DM may indicate a specific reduction in large HDL particles as well as a possible increase in small HDL particles, which may not necessarily significantly reduce apoA1 levels. Moreover, the multiplex apo test can be performed in the nonfasting state.
| Conclusions|| |
Dyslipidemia, along with insulinemia and glycemia, is one of the most significant IR risk factors in the acute and early recovery phases of MI. Dyslipidemia is characterized by a high lipid level; an imbalance in apos metabolism; and a deficiency of apoA1 in the acute and early recovery periods of MI. ApoA1 and E can be used as promising molecular markers to stratify the risk of recurrent acute coronary events in MI patients.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Mehta PK, Wei J, Wenger NK. Ischemic heart disease in women: A focus on risk factors. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2015;25:140-51.
Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Roth GA, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Flaxman A, et al
. The global burden of ischemic heart disease in 1990 and 2010: The Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Circulation 2014;129:1493-501.
Dennis KL, Anthony FS, Stephen HL, Dan LL, Larry JJ, Joseph L. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hil Education; 2015. p. 98-9.
Gupta R, Munoz R. Evaluation and management of chest pain in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2016;34:523-42.
Hooper L, Martin N, Abdelhamid A, Smith DG. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;6:CD011737.
Fuenzalida B, Sobrevia B, Cantin C, Carvajal L, Salsoso R, Gutiérrez J, et al.
Maternal supraphysiological hypercholesterolemia associates with endothelial dysfunction of the placental microvasculature. Sci Rep 2018;8:7690.
Zanoni P, Khetarpal SA, Larach DB, Hancock-Cerutti WF, Millar JS, Cuchel M, et al.
Rare variant in scavenger receptor BI raises HDL cholesterol and increases risk of coronary heart disease. Science 2016;351:1166-71.
Kallol S, Huang X, Muller S, Ontsouka C, Albrecht C. Novel insights into concepts and directionality of maternal-fetal cholesterol transfer across the human placenta. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:2334.
Melhem H, Sampada Kallol S, Xiao Huang X, Michael Luthi M, Ontsouka C, Keogh A, et al
. Placental secretion of apolipoprotein A1 and E: The antiatherogenic impact of the placenta. Sci Rep 2019;9:6225.
Nishio K, Shigemitsu M, Kusuyama T, Fukui T, Kawamura K, Itoh S, et al.
Insulin resistance in nondiabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2006;7:54-60.
Lopez-Jimenez F, Miranda WR. Diagnosing obesity: Beyond BMI. Virtual Mentor 2010;12:292-8.
Farooq AK, Sikandar HK, Amir I, Abdus S, Mohammad D, Rizwan H. Common anthropometric indices and insulin resistance. Pak J Med Res 2009;48:39-43.
Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, Bloomgarden ZT, Fonseca VA, Garber AJ, et al
. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology guidelines for management of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Endocr Pract 2017;23:1-87.
Mahato RV, Gyawali P, Raut P, Regmi P, Singh K, Pandeya DR, et al
. Association between glycemic control and serum lipid profile in type 2 diabetic patients: Glycated hemoglobin as a dual biomarker. Biomed Res 2011;22:375-80.
McAuley KA, Williams SM, Mann JI, Walker RJ, Lewis-Barned NJ, Temple LA, et al.
Diagnosing insulin resistance in the general population. Diabetes Care 2001;24:460-4.
Regmi P, Gyawali P, Shrestha R, Sigdel M, Mehta KD, Majhi S. Pattern of dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetic subjects in Eastern Nepal. JNAMLS 2009;10:11-3.
Mendivil CO, Zheng C, Furtado J, Lel J, Sacks FM. Metabolism of very-low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein containing apolipoprotein C-III and not other small apolipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010;30:239-45.
Kimm H, Lee SW, Lee HS, Shim KW, Cho CY, Yun JE, et al.
Associations between lipid measures and metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and adiponectin – Usefulness of lipid ratios in Korean men and women. Circ J 2010;74:931-7.
Seong CS, Kim YY, Khang YH, Heon Park J, Kang HJ, Lee H, et al
. Data resource profile: The national health information database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2016;46:799-800.
Holmes MV, Millwood IY, Kartsonaki C, Hill MR, Bennett DA, Boxall R, et al.
Lipids, lipoproteins, and metabolites and risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:620-32.
Sofat R, Cooper JA, Kumari M, Casas JP, Mitchell JP, Acharya J, et al.
Circulating apolipoprotein E concentration and cardiovascular disease risk: Meta-analysis of results from three studies. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002146.
Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al
. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1713-22.
Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A, Mora S, Kolovou G, Baum H, Bruckert E, et al
. Fasting is not routinely required for determination of a lipid profile: Clinical and laboratory implications including flagging at desirable concentration cutpoints – A joint consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society and European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem 2016;62:930-46.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]